The many facets of the neonicotinoid issue

The neonic debate is not a one-issue, one solution scenario

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: April 29, 2015

bee on a canola plant

Whoever you talk to in agriculture today, most people agree this is not a one-issue, one-solution scenario. As Dr. Cynthia Scott-Dupree has stated this is more like a 1,000-piece puzzle.

The following are just some of the aspects involved in the neonicotinoid debate that may or may not have made it into media reports or websites:

  • Neonicotinoid-based seed treatments have been a staple for canola growers in Western Canada for longer than in Ontario, yet there has been less concern there about the use of seed treatments.
  • Read Also

    Canada, Vancouver, Richmond farm region.farmer checking crop of cucumbers

    Could crop sharing be a viable option for your farm?

    Crop sharing could be a good option for young and beginning farmers.

  • Neonicotinoid-based seed treatments are highly specific, and safer than previously available foliar treatments.
  • Use of neonicotinoids in Australia pre-dates that of Canada — without any negative impacts — nor is there an issue with varroa mite.
  • Corn is cross-pollinated and contains no nectar, and soybeans and wheat are self-pollinating; the crops hold little appeal for bees.
  • As far as quality of nectar and pollen protein levels are concerned, canola is one of the best forage sources but blueberry is one of the poorest.
  • Ontario’s beekeepers have increased their pollination services by 200 to 300 per cent in the past 10 years, a period in which beekeepers claim honey production has dropped by 20 per cent.
  • Is succession in the beekeeping industry affecting production?
  • Use of formic acid with oxalic acid to control varroa mites is fatal to bees.

About The Author

Ralph Pearce

Ralph Pearce

CG Production Editor

explore

Stories from our other publications