Your Reading List

Pest Patrol: Questions about sulphur deficiency

#PestPatrol with Mike Cowbrough, OMAFRA

I’m asked if growers can mix ammonium thiosulphate (ATS) with herbicides and fungicides to address sulphur deficiency symptoms, or should they apply it separately with streamer nozzles?

With reductions in atmospheric sulphur deposits, Ontario research has found significant sulphur responses (10-14 bu./ac.) on some fields, while others have shown little or no response, especially where manure had been applied. Of all the Ontario trial sites, 59 per cent were responsive, with an average response of 3.8 bu./ac., while across all sites the average response was 2 bu./ac., (Figure 1 below).

Figure 1: Sulphur response in wheat.
photo: From OMAFRA Publication 811, Agronomy Guide for Field Crops

Ideally, sulphur is applied as ATS with 28 per cent urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) at tillering in early spring. However, today’s question deals with a farmer seeing deficiency symptoms and wanting to address when they apply a herbicide or fungicide (or perhaps both). Under this circumstance there are usually four questions:

Q: Does ATS when applied with nozzles that are used for pesticide applications (and therefore finer droplets) result in increased visual crop injury?

A: Yes, streamer nozzles would dramatically decrease the amount of foliar burn that is caused when ATS is applied with a nozzle used for applying pesticides.

Q: Does mixing ATS with a herbicide and/or a fungicide increase the risk of crop injury?

Related Articles

A: Yes, a recent paper by Dr. Dave Hooker and his colleagues showed that the addition of ATS increased visual injury in wheat and was greatest in a three-way herbicide + fungicide + ATS tank mix (Table 1 below).

Q: Would increasing water volumes decrease the risk of crop injury with ATS because you are diluting the concentration of ATS in the carrier volume?

A: During the 2018 field seasons we evaluated ATS tank mixes with herbicides at two different carrier volumes. The first carrier volume was a 1:1 ratio of ATS to water (100 l/ha or 10 gal./ac. total carrier volume) while the second was a 1:3 ratio of ATS to water (200 l/ha or 20 gal./ac. total carrier volume). We observed a similar increase in crop injury when ATS was tank mixed with herbicide as the Hooker paper did. However, we did not observe any visual differences in foliar injury when using different carrier volumes. We would speculate that even though we were diluting the amount of ATS with a higher carrier volume when the ATS to water ratio was 1:3 compared to 1:1, we were also increasing the foliar coverage on the cereal leaves with the higher carrier volume, perhaps negating any benefit of dilution. It is important to keep in mind that this was only one trial conducted in one year, so the sample size is very small, but there was no evidence in this trial that increased carrier volume decreased foliar leaf burn.

Figure 2: Sulphur deficiency in winter wheat, May 2016.
photo: Courtesy Marieke Patton

Q: Does injury from ATS cause yield loss?

A: It does not appear to. In our study from 2018, there was no difference in winter wheat yield across all treatments, regardless of amount of foliar injury (which in some instances reached 15 per cent visual injury (Figure 3 below and Figure 4 at top). It should be noted that injury from ATS seems to be most apparent in the first three to five days after application but after 14 days it has virtually disappeared. The Hooker study also found that despite significant crop injury, the injury was transient and there was no evidence that grain yield was adversely affected.

Figure 3: Foliar leaf burn in winter wheat caused by an application of ATS with a herbicide in 2018 at the Woodstock Research Station.
photo: Supplied

Have a question you want answered? Hashtag #PestPatrol on Twitter to @cowbrough or email Mike at [email protected].

Citation: D.C. Hooker, N. Soltani and P.H. Sikkema. 2018. Response of winter wheat to herbicide plus fungicide plus ammonium thiosulphate tank-mixes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 98: 1357–1364

About the author

Comments

explore

Stories from our other publications