Ont. to sell LCBO HQ, takes aim at horseracing funds

Feb 13, 2012 7:10 PM - 6 comments
TEXT SIZE bigger text smaller text

By: Staff

The Ontario government's deficit-cutting measures will now include the sale of the Crown-owned liquor marketer's headquarters and, possibly, deep cuts to its subsidies for the horseracing sector.

Provincial Finance Minister Dwight Duncan said Monday the government will sell the head office of LCBO and redevelop the land where the building now sits.

LCBO's office, at 55 Lake Shore Blvd. E. on the edge of Toronto's Harbourfront district, is on "some of the most valuable, under-developed real estate in Canada," the province said.

The head office building and large warehouse at the site date back to 1954. LCBO's "flagship store," which is on the same site, would be redeveloped but the store would remain "in the vicinity," the province said.

LCBO "will realize ongoing savings and after the land is sold and a new, modern facility is built, it is expected to generate well over $200 million for taxpayers," the province said.

LCBO, which bills itself as "one of the world's largest buyers and retailers of beverage alcohol," booked sales of $4.58 billion in fiscal 2010-11.

"Will evaluate"

While the province did not commit Monday to specific cuts in support for horseracing, it noted Ontario taxpayers have, since 1998, supported horseracing with annual subsidies of up to $345 million.

"The province will evaluate that subsidy given the need to continue to invest in health care and education," the government said.

More specifically, the province noted that at 17 locations, Ontario "has more racetracks and provides more public funding than any other place in North America."

The current cost of the province's subsidy to the sector "would pay for over 27,800 hip or knee replacement surgeries or provide over nine million hours of home care," the government said.

The LCBO land sale and other moves announced Monday are expected to help the province eliminate its deficit by 2017-18, Duncan said.




Horizontal ruler

Reader Comments

Most recent firstOldest first

Andrew

Vol- The only dirty little secret is the government's. They are pulling the wool over everyone's eyes by making people think taxpayers are propping up an industry. That simply is not the case. It's amazing how people can become responsible for the economy of a province without knowing the definition of "subsidy." The FACT is, there is a partnership in place where racetracks receive only %20 of the revenue generated at the slot parlors. This money is spent by WILLING ADULTS that are seeking entertainment and their own financial gains through gambling. That is not tax. It is not mandatory to put money in a slot machine in the way it is mandatory to pay taxes. That money rightfully belongs to the racetracks that allowed slots to exist at their facilities. This is one of the most profitable partnerships, and an example of how companies should work together. But what would the government know about working together? They're not self-sufficient. Should they go behind the barn?

Posted February 22, 2012 09:11 PM


Bridgette

This article misreprents the OLG Slots at Racetracks program. The program is a revenue sharing partnership with 10 per cent going to the racetrack host for refurbishments to help enhance the slots partnership and 10 per cent to the horse people for their employment and wages (purses). The government benefits from this business deal receiving the other 80 per cent of revenues (5 to the host municipal and 75 to the province). And yes, Ontario does have more racetracks than other provinces, but that is because it's horse racing industry is larger and offers a world-class product. The horse racing industry is the second largest sub-sector of Ontario¿s agricultural economy and employs 60,000 Ontarians. There are more repercussions to this recommendation than benefits for Ontario.

Posted February 15, 2012 11:53 PM


M. Taylor

Our local fall Fair is one of the few in Ontario still featuring harness racing. It's been touch-and-go lately whether it can carry on without more support from the racing industry. The "take" from the pari-mutual window barely covers the cost of putting it on, and without attractive prize money the horses won't come. If they lose their subsidy, we're probably looking at the end of an era.

Posted February 15, 2012 04:22 PM


M.G. Allmendinger

This is somewhat misleading for the government to call these subsidies.. 1. Revenues are shared with Tracks where there are slot facilities..(not from lotteries or other gaming facilities) 2. Woodbine for example has an agreement for 20% of the net slot revenue. It is reasonable to conclude that if these slots were not located at the Tracks... then both the Government and the Track would suffer decreased revenues. The horse racing is also a draw for people who ... play the slots while at the track.. If there were no slots at the track... Government's share of the take would be less as well.. 3. Examine the OLG financial statements (posted on their website) and you will note that the OLG is losing money at it's full service casinos... Niagara and Windsor.... Most of their gaming profit comes from slot casinos on Racetracks... 3. These agreements were made...because the Government ventured into Gambling and competes with Horse racing..which used to be the only form of gambling in Ontaro.... perhaps the Government should compete in other areas as well? 4. There are many economic impact studies which I have read which clearly show that the HOrse Industry is #2 Agriculture activity in Ontario..expecially when all the spinoffs are included... feed, vet..meds..fodder..employment..breeding..training..tracks.. 5. I seriously doubt that even the Liberals will venture into this issue.. they are merely testing the waters... with these releases... Once the Agricultural and Horse racing groups swing into gear...this will be a dead issue..

Posted February 14, 2012 04:02 PM


Bill Silversides

Your version of this news doesn't mention that the race tracks are getting funding from government GAMBLING revenue. Which of course is partly generated by people betting on horse races. How much can the subsidy be cut before the industry is in bad enough trouble that government revenues drop by more than the current subsidy? By the way- I'm anti- gambling and would love to see it stopped. Still- the racing industry provides a lot of enjoyable jobs and helps our economy. I love a horse race- just won't bet.

Posted February 14, 2012 11:19 AM


FirstPrevNextLast
Horizontal Ruler

Post A Comment

Disclaimer
Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that Country Guide West has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published and those that are published will not be edited. However, all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Your Name (this will appear with your post) *

Email Address (will not be published) *

Comments *



* mandatory fields